<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dave Riley &#187; Accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daveriley.com/tag/accessibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daveriley.com</link>
	<description>Welcome to Dave Riley&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Image button found guilty of not being valid xhtml horror!!!</title>
		<link>http://daveriley.com/2009/07/14/image-button-found-guilty-of-not-being-valid-xhtml-horror/</link>
		<comments>http://daveriley.com/2009/07/14/image-button-found-guilty-of-not-being-valid-xhtml-horror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asp.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[validator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wc3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xhtml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveriley.com/?p=932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The .net image button seems so innocent but a trip over to w3c.org and the html validator soon exposes the terrible truth. Prepare yourself for this, sit down, have a large brandy ready&#8230; It renders border=&#8221;0&#8243; even though you haven&#8217;t put one in there yourself! try it! Put any xhtml 1.0 transitional site into the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The .net image button seems so innocent but a trip over to w3c.org and the html validator soon exposes the terrible truth. Prepare yourself for this, sit down, have a large brandy ready&#8230; It renders border=&#8221;0&#8243; even though you haven&#8217;t put one in there yourself! try it! Put any xhtml 1.0 transitional site into the validator:</p>
<p>http://validator.w3.org/</p>
<p>And watch in utter horror while your site is rejected as a bad example to kids everywhere.</p>
<p>So what is going on here? And is there anyway out?</p>
<p>Well after some digging I found an excellent article:</p>
<p>http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/netfxbcl/thread/ac098c63-61ff-4b53-b5ad-72cb2eb0f7f2</p>
<p>It turns out the validator is unrecognised as a browser type to asp.net and so is presented with html 4.0 instead of xhtml, hence the border=&#8221;0&#8243; debarkle.</p>
<p>Is there a workaround? Yes there is either don&#8217;t use image buttons or put this in your web.config:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-right: 0px;" dir="ltr"><p><span style="color: #0000ff; font-size: x-small;">&lt;</span><span style="color: #800000; font-size: x-small;">browserCaps</span><span style="color: #0000ff; font-size: x-small;">&gt;<br />
&lt;</span><span style="color: #800000; font-size: x-small;">case</span><span style="color: #0000ff; font-size: x-small;"> </span><span style="color: #ff0000; font-size: x-small;">match</span><span style="color: #0000ff; font-size: x-small;">=</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">&#8220;</span><span style="color: #0000ff; font-size: x-small;">W3C_Validator*</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">&#8220;</span><span style="color: #0000ff; font-size: x-small;">&gt;<br />
</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">TagWriter = System.Web.UI.HtmlTextWriter<br />
W3CDomVersion = 1.0<br />
</span><span style="color: #0000ff; font-size: x-small;">&lt;/</span><span style="color: #800000; font-size: x-small;">case</span><span style="color: #0000ff; font-size: x-small;">&gt;<br />
&lt;/</span><span style="color: #800000; font-size: x-small;">browserCaps</span><span style="color: #0000ff; font-size: x-small;">&gt;</span></p></blockquote>
<p>A solution to a weird problem, but necessary if like me you want that green tick <img src='http://daveriley.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daveriley.com/2009/07/14/image-button-found-guilty-of-not-being-valid-xhtml-horror/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New BBC News website sucks! 7 things I hate about bbc news.</title>
		<link>http://daveriley.com/2008/07/06/new-bbc-news-website-sucks-7-things-i-hate-about-bbc-news/</link>
		<comments>http://daveriley.com/2008/07/06/new-bbc-news-website-sucks-7-things-i-hate-about-bbc-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 21:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Riley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveriley.com/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sorry but this is what I believe. I have had a lot of problems with the BBC news site in the past: 1. most read, most email varies depending on what page you&#8217;re on! How is that possible? 2.Video/Audio/text content is only available in 1 form, you need to support at least text, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry but this is what I believe. I have had a lot of problems with the BBC news site in the past:</p>
<p>1. most read, most email varies depending on what page you&#8217;re on! How is that possible?</p>
<p>2.Video/Audio/text content is only available in 1 form, you need to support at least text, but many stories are video only. Why? At least have a subtitles option.</p>
<p>3. &#8220;Scientists say&#8221; stories! Tea is good for you, tea is bad for you&#8230; etc. etc. no evidence, rarely do they even bother to name the scientists involved, this is dumbed down nonsense. STOP IT! This is true of the TV news as well as the site.</p>
<p>4. Sources should be clearly quoted at the end of each story; so that we can check these sources and find out more.</p>
<p>5. They boast accessibility but the &#8220;new&#8221; website still uses tables for formatting!!! Making the site very hard to navigate for the visually impaired. this is a basic stuff come on BBC if you need some help with this please just ask! Other BBC sites are very accessible so just no excuse really.</p>
<p>6. The news ticker on the front page should have a back/forward button, it&#8217;s so frustrating when you get a glimpse of a interesting story then have to wait for it to come around again.</p>
<p>7. Very biased reporting on Bill Gates recently, seemed to be just free publicity for Microsoft</p>
<p>The good news is the bbc news site could really be a world class site if it could address these problems. Generally news is the BBC&#8217;s flagship product, they must not fall into the trap of dumbing down news to retain more viewers.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daveriley.com/2008/07/06/new-bbc-news-website-sucks-7-things-i-hate-about-bbc-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
